Business Environment, Competitive Advantage, and Firm Performance among Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprises: An Integrated Resource-Based and Dynamic Capability Perspective

Main Article Content

Indra Jaya Nugraha
Isagani M. Tano
Epimaco A. Cabanlit, J.

Abstract

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) constitute the backbone of Indonesia's economic system by contributing substantially to employment generation, regional development, innovation, and inclusive economic growth. Despite their strategic importance, many Indonesian SMEs continue to experience persistent challenges associated with environmental uncertainty, limited organizational capabilities, technological disruption, increasing competitive intensity, and institutional constraints. These challenges require SMEs not only to adapt to changing business environments but also to develop sustainable competitive advantages capable of improving organizational performance over time. Drawing upon the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capability Theory (DCT), this study develops an integrated conceptual framework explaining how business environment influences SME performance directly and indirectly through competitive advantage.


Unlike previous studies that primarily examine environmental factors as isolated antecedents of organizational performance, this study conceptualizes business environment as a multidimensional construct encompassing both internal organizational resources and external environmental conditions. Competitive advantage is proposed as the strategic mechanism through which SMEs transform valuable organizational resources and adaptive capabilities into superior market performance. The proposed framework highlights the strategic role of dynamic capabilities in sensing environmental opportunities, seizing emerging market potential, and continuously transforming organizational resources to sustain competitiveness in highly dynamic markets.


This study adopts a quantitative explanatory research design involving Indonesian SMEs. Structural Equation Modeling using Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM) is proposed to evaluate the hypothesized relationships among business environment, competitive advantage, and firm performance. Business performance is assessed using multidimensional indicators, including sales growth, market expansion, profitability, capital growth, and organizational sustainability.


The study contributes theoretically by integrating Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory into a comprehensive model suitable for explaining SME competitiveness in emerging economies. Practically, the findings are expected to provide valuable managerial insights for SME owners and policymakers seeking to strengthen organizational resilience, enhance competitive positioning, and improve long-term business sustainability amid rapidly evolving economic conditions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jaya Nugraha, I., M. Tano, I., & A. Cabanlit, J., E. (2026). Business Environment, Competitive Advantage, and Firm Performance among Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprises: An Integrated Resource-Based and Dynamic Capability Perspective. Journal of Managerial Sciences and Studies, 4(2), 1458–1481. https://doi.org/10.61160/jomss.v4i2.134
Section
Articles

References

Anwar, M., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation and generic competitive strategies for emerging SMEs: Financial and non-financial performance perspective. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2125.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643–650.

Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-based theory and the value creation framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936–1955.

Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2022). Strategic management and competitive advantage: Concepts and cases (7th ed.). Pearson.

Cepeda-Carrion, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(2), 170–182.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

Ketchen, D. J., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2018). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation, and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3), 345–349.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2022). Marketing management (16th Global ed.). Pearson.

Kraus, S., Breier, M., Jones, P., & Hughes, M. (2019). Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1247–1268.

Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance. British Journal of Management, 31(2), 272–293.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4 user manual. SmartPLS GmbH.

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211.

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research. Springer.

Suhermawan, Dody (2026) Metode Riset Kuantitatif atau Kualitatif..Mana yang Lebih Cocok ? https://www.leveons.id/insight/metode-riset-kuantitatif-atau-kualitatifmana-yang-lebih-cocok-

Suhermawan, Dody (2026) Leveons Konsultan Bisnis UKM, https://www.leveons.id/insight/konsultan-bisnis-mitra-strategis-ukm

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8–37.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.

Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35.

Tornikoski, E., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311–335.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

World Bank. (2023). Indonesia economic prospects: Strengthening resilience in uncertain times. World Bank.

Yamin, S., & Mulyadi, H. (2023). Structural equation modeling with SmartPLS 4. Salemba Empat.

Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model, and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.