An Empirical Review of Determinants Influencing Firm Collaboration and Their Impact on Competitive Performance
Article Sidebar
Market Orientation,
Brand Orientation,
Strategic Knowledge,
Competitive Advantage
Main Article Content
Abstract
Achieving a sustainable competitive advantage is essential for improving marketing performance in highly dynamic business environments. One strategic approach to attaining this objective is through relationship learning, which enables firms to enhance their organizational learning capabilities by facilitating systematic information exchange, fostering shared learning platforms, and aligning behaviors with stakeholder expectations. Relationship learning is not limited to dyadic firm-stakeholder interactions but also encompasses insights obtained from external sources such as scientific publications and academic research. By integrating both internal and external knowledge, firms can develop a comprehensive understanding of their strategic environment, allowing them to formulate more adaptive and effective marketing strategies. The establishment of mutual understanding through continuous collaborative efforts between customers and suppliers serves as a foundation for influencing behavioral alignment and strategic coherence. This dynamic learning process significantly contributes to the development of a firm’s competitive advantage, thereby strengthening its marketing performance over time.
Article Details
References
D. R. Hansen and M. M. Mowen, Accounting of Management. Volume II. Fourth Edition. Translation. Ancella A. Hermawan. Jakarta: Erlangga Publisher, 2013.
M. E. Porter, Competition Strategy: Techniques to Analyzing Industry and Competitors. Translated by Agus Maulana. Jakarta: Airlangga, 2015.
F. Tjiptono, Strategic Marketing. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher, 2014.
M. Valos, Fitzroy, and Peter, “Strategy Implementation For Superior Marketing Performance,” ANZMAC Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, 2016.
A. K. Kohli and B. J. Jaworski, “Marketing Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, And Managerial Implications,” J. Mark., vol. 54, 2013.
P. Kotler and G. Armstrong, Principles of Marketing, 12th edition. Prentice Hall International, Inc., 2013.
G. J. Hooley, N. F. Pierce, and B. Micouland, Marketing Strategy and Competitive Positioning, 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, 2014.
K. H. Chang and D. F. Gotcher, “Relationship learning and dyadic knowledge creation in international subcontracting relationships: the supplier’s perspective,” Int. J. Technol. Manag., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 55–74, 2013.
L. Lamberti and G. Noci, “Marketing Strategy and Marketing Performance Measurement System: Exploring The Relationship,” Eur. Manag. J., 2015.
H. Y. Wong and B. Merrilees, “A Brand orientation Typology For SMEs: A Case Report Approach,” J. Prod. Brand Manag., 2013.
M. T. Ewing and J. Napoli, “Developing and Validating A Multidimensional Nonprofit Brand orientation Scale,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 58, 2014.
N. Segev, Antecedents Of Market-Orientation In The Public Sector-The Case Of The Municipal Social-Welfare Agencies. Zevulun: Oranim Academic College of Education, 2015.
A. K. Kohli and B. J. Jaworski, “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” J. Mark., vol. 57, 2013.
M. Pont and R. Shaw, “Measuring Marketing Performance: A Critique Of Empirical Literature,” ANZMAC Conference Proceedings Adelaide, 2014.
M. Urde, “Brand orientation Strategy For Survival,” J. Consum. Mark., 2013.
J. Dawes, “Market Orientation And Company Profitability: Further Evidence Incorporating Longitudinal Data,” Aust. J. Manag., vol. 25, no. 2, 2014.
R. Vazquez, Santos, and Alvarez, “Market Orientation, Innovation And Competitive Strategies In Industrial Firms,” J. Strateg. Mark., vol. 9, pp. 69–90, 2013.
M. S. Cheung, M. B. Myers, and J. T. Mentzer, “Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross-national supply chain investigation,” J. Oper. Manag., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 472–487, 2014.