IMPACT OF FUNDAMENTAL MACROECONOMIC FACTORS, COST EFFICIENCY, FIRMS POLICIES WITH SYSTEMATIC RISK AS MEDIATOR ON ISLAMIC FINTECH WELFARE PERFORMANCE : EVIDENCE FROM AN INDONESIA'S ISLAMIC FINTECH INSTITUTION
Article Sidebar
systematic risks,
firm policy,
firm performance,
firm value
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study tries to answer some questions on the impact of Fundamental Macroeconomic Factors, Cost Efficiency, Firms Policies to Islamic Fintech Walfare from economically emerging country like Indonesia. The analysis was conducted gradually by placing systematic risk and firm performance as intervening variables. This research, in specific, aims to test the gradual effect of macroeconomic fundamental factors on firm performance and firm value.
The theoretical base applied to support this research was two established financial theories, such as agency and capital structure theory. This study used the samples of the Islamic Fintch Institution that listed in Indonesia's stock exchange, which the stocks actively traded in Indonesia's Stock Exchange. The data used was panel data, namely, the data of cross section and time series from the period of 2017 to 20019.
The research results are; first, the macroeconomics variables (inflation, interest rate, exchange rate, and economic growth) have significant effect on systematic risks. On the other hand, systematic risks have significant effect on firm performance, and firm performance has significant effect on firm value. Second, the variables of firm policy (manager incentive and financial leverage) have significant effect on firm performance, and firm performance has significant effect on firm value.
However, capital expenditure has insignificant effect on firm performance and firm value rather than manager incentive and financial leverage. Third, special findings from this research are that there is gradual process in influencing firm value so that firm performance has the role as intervening variable, which is the variables mediating the effects of macroeconomic variable (exchange rate), systematic risk, and firm policy (manager incentive) in Islamic financial technology welfare.
Article Details
References
Abojeib, M., Habib, F. 2019. Blockchain for Islamic Social Responsibility Institutions, FinTech
as a Disruptive Technology for Financial Institutions. IGI Global, 221-240.
Abu-Bakar, N., Sofian, R., Kiyotaka, U. 2017. Cryptocurrency Framework Diagnostics from
Islamic Finance Perspective: A New Insight of Bitcoin System Transaction. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 4(1), 19-28.
Abu-Bakar, M.M. 2018. Shariah Analysis of Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency and Blockchain.
Alam N., Gupta L., Zameni, A. 2019a. Fintech Regulation. In: Fintech and Islamic Finance,
-158. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Alam, N., Gupta, L., Zameni, A. 2019b. Challenges and Success Factors for Islamic Fintech.
In Fintech and Islamic Finance, 159-173. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Alam, N., Gupta, L., Zameni, A. 2019c. Cryptocurrency and Islamic Finance. In Fintech and
Islamic Finance, 99-118. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review
Alexandre, A. 2018. Stellar Becomes ‘First’ Shari’ah-Certified Blockchain for Payments and
Asset Tokenization. In the Cointelegraph, the Future of Money, 18.
Alt, R., Beck, R., Smits, M.T. 2018. FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry.
Electronic Markets, 28, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0310-9.
Anagnostopoulos, Y. 2018. Fintech and Regtech: Impact on Regulators and Banks. Journal
of Economics and Business, 100(10). Doi:1016/j.jeconbus.2018.07.003.
Asif, S. 2018. The Halal and Haram Aspects of Digital Currencies in Islam,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326398987_The_Halal_and_Haram_Aspects_of_Digital Currencies_in_Islam.
Bajakić, I. 2019. Financial Integration of the New Member States–Case Study of EU’s
Regulatory Initiative on Financial Technologies. doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2019.331.
Beik, I.S., Arsyianti, L.D. 2008. Why the rate of financing in Islamic Banks is high? An
analysis based on the Malaysian case. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 3(1).
Bettinger, A. 1972. Fintech: A series of 40-time shared models used at manufacturers
Hanover trust company. Interfaces 62-63.
Biancone, P.P., Secinaro, S., Kamal, M. 2019. Crowdfunding and Fintech: business model M.R.
Rabbani, S. Khan, E.I. Thalassinos sharia-compliant. European Journal of Islamic Finance, 12.
Billah, M.M. 2019. Islamic Cryptocurrency. Islamic Financial Products, 413-434.
Juan Antonio Ketterer.2017. Digital Finance New Times, New Challenges, New
Opportunities. IDB-Inter American Development Bank
Saba, I., Rehana, K., Imran, S.C. 2019. FinTech and Islamic Finance-Challenges and
Opportunities. Review of Economics and Development Studies, Volume 5, No. 4.
Saksonova, S., Kuzmina-Merlino, I. 2017. Fintech as Financial Innovation-The Possibilities
and Problems of Implementation. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3A), 961-973.
Sangwan, V.H., Prakash, P., Singh, S. 2019. Financial technology: a review of extant
literature. Studies in Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-07-2019-0270.
Sanicola, L. 2019. What is FinTech? Huffington Post. Available online:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-isfintech_b_58a20d80e4b0cd37efcfebaa.
Satyawati, I., Suroso, S., Suryanto, T., Nurjannah, S.D. 2017. Does Financial Performance of
Islamic is better? Panel Data Estimation. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2A), 592-606.
Schindler, J. 2017. FinTech and Financial Innovation: Drivers and Depth. Finance and
Economics Discussion Series. Doi: 10.17016/FEDS.2017.081.
Schueffel, P. 2016. Taming the beast: A scientific definition of fintech. Journal of Innovation
Management, 4, 32-54. doi: 10.24840/2183-0606_004.004_0004.
Schwarcz, S.L. 2013. Regulating Shadows: Financial Regulation and Responsibility Failure. Lee
Law Review, 1781-1825.