Social Entrepreneurship In The New Economy Among The Younger Generation
Article Sidebar
economy 4.0,
social entrepreneurship,
non-profit sector,
student cooperatives
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: This essay aims to reconstruct young people's understanding of and attitude towards social entrepreneurship as a field of endeavour critical to developing crucial competencies in the New Economy. The study also aims to describe young people's perceptions of their willingness to participate in society and the current economy as agents.
Design/methodology/approach: In order to accomplish this, a diagnostic study (based on a so-called task catalogue) was carried out with a group of more than 500 students in Indonesian vocational high schools, senior high schools, and private schools, as well as three workshops with students from particular school types.
Findings: According to the study, students are aware of the possibilities of engaging in social activism through broadly construed social entrepreneurship and third sector involvement. It was also proven that they are well cognizant of the opportunities and requirement for action in this regard. The materials that students have discussed transfer into skills required in the New Economy.
Research limitations/implications: A lot of variables that could influence teenage behaviour must be taken into account in modern study. These difficulties will undoubtedly merit consideration throughout the formulation and creation of the research's tools in further in-depth studies.
Practical implications: Young people's social entrepreneurship is constantly evolving, and even though its focus shifts (from shared management activities to civic engagement and social solidarity activities), it always refers to collaborative efforts on the cusp of economic and social reality. Young people's attitude towards carrying out duties that are beneficial to society is also evolving. Young people view them as a chance to address both societal issues and the difficulties posed by the postmodern world's transformations.
Social implications: Young people are more conscious and involved citizens as well as more responsible future members of the New Economy thanks to the competencies they have acquired.
Originality/value: The paper reconstructs the tools, strategies, and perspectives of young people towards the agency opportunities provided by social entrepreneurship. The knowledge that was gathered was examined in light of the project's competency-based competence issues.
Article Details
References
Adnan, A. H. M., Rahmat, A. M., Mohtar, N. M., & Anuar, N. (2021, February). Industry 4.0 critical skills and career readiness of ASEAN TVET tertiary students in Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1793, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing.
Agolla, J. E. (2018). Human capital in the smart manufacturing and industry 4.0 revolution. Digital transformation in smart manufacturing, 41-58.
Alam, A. (2022). Investigating sustainable education and positive psychology interventions in schools towards achievement of sustainable happiness and wellbeing for 21st century pedagogy and curriculum. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 19481.
Alliance, G. S. I. (2017). Global sustainable investment review 2016.
Andayani, E., Hariani, L. S., & Jauhari, M. (2021). Pembentukan kemandirian melalui pembelajaran kewirausahaan sosial untuk meningkatkan kesadaran sosial dan kesadaran ekonomi. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Ekonomi, 6(1), 22-34.
Augustyński, I. (ed.) (2018). Pomyśleć ekonomię od nowa. Przewodnik po głównych nurtach ekonomii heterodoksyjnej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Heterodox.
Aurich, J. C., Mannweiler, C., & Schweitzer, E. (2010). How to design and offer services successfully. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3), 136-143.
Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., ... & Mendis, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Machine and deep learning methods and applications. Automation in Construction, 141, 104440.
Bag, S., Pretorius, J. H. C., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120420.
Barki, E., Comini, G., Cunliffe, A., Hart, S., & Rai, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: Retrospective and prospective research. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55, 380-384.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British journal of educational technology, 39(5), 775-786.
Bjärsholm, D. (2017). Sport and social entrepreneurship: A review of a concept in progress. Journal of Sport Management, 31(2), 191-206.
Brabazon, T. (2017). From revolution to revelation: Generation X, popular memory and cultural studies. Routledge.
Bridgeland, J., Bruce, M., & Hariharan, A. (2013). The Missing Piece: A National Teacher Survey on How Social and Emotional Learning Can Empower Children and Transform Schools. A Report for CASEL. Civic Enterprises.
Buasuwan, P. (2018). Rethinking Thai higher education for Thailand 4.0. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(2), 157-173.
Carlisle, S., Ivanov, S., & Dijkmans, C. (2023). The digital skills divide: evidence from the European tourism industry. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 240-266.
Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. Korzystanie z Internetu. Komunikat z badań nr 85/2020.https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_085_20.PDF, 08.05.2022.
Certo, S. T., & Miller, T. (2008). Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business horizons, 51(4), 267-271.
Chertoff, J. D., Zarzour, J. G., Morgan, D. E., Lewis, P. J., Canon, C. L., & Harvey, J. A. (2020). The early influence and effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on resident education and adaptations. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 17(10), 1322-1328.
Chollisni, A., Syahrani, S., Shandy, A., & Anas, M. (2022). The concept of creative economy development-strengthening post COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 413-426.
Ciepielewska-Kowalik A., Pieliński B., Starnawska M., Szymańska A. (2015). Social 7 Enterprise in Poland: Institutional and Historical Context, “ICSEM Working Papers”, 8 Nr 11, The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project, Liege.
Cukier, W., Trenholm, S., Carl, D., & Gekas, G. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A content analysis. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(1), 99-119.
Culot, G., Nassimbeni, G., Orzes, G., & Sartor, M. (2020). Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107617.
de Bruin, A., Shaw, E., & Lewis, K. V. (2017). The collaborative dynamic in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(7-8), 575-585.
Defourny, J., Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise. The Emergence of Social Enterprise; Borzaga, C., Defourny, J., Eds, 17-31.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 16(4), 417-436.
Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. MIT press
Frączak, P. (2006). Szkic do historii ekonomii społecznej w Polsce. Dokument 10 elektroniczny: http://wiadomosci.ngo.pl/files/ekonomiaspoleczna.pl/public/Raport_Otwarcia/Fraczak_Historia.pdf, 08.05.2022.
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model.
Fundacja Rozwoju Spółdzielczości Uczniowskiej, http://www.frsu.pl/, 08.05.2022.
Garvin, T. (2004). Preventing the future: Why was Ireland so poor for so long?. Gill & Macmillan Ltd.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner production, 114, 11-32.
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493
Grenčiková, A., Kordoš, M., Navickas, V. (2021). The impact of Industry 4.0 on education 14 contents. Business: Theory and Practice, Vol. 22 Iss. 1, https://doi.org/10.3846/ 15 btp.2021.13166, 08.05.2022.
Grusec, J. E., & Lytton, H. (2012). Social development: History, theory, and research. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hasan, H. A. (2020). Pendidikan kewirausahaan: Konsep, karakteristik dan Implikasi dalam Memandirikan generasi Muda. PILAR, 11(1).
Hopper, M. (2018). Activist Social Entrepreneurship: A Case Study of the Green Campus Co-operative.
Karsidi, D. R. (2005). Sosiologi pendidikan.
Krzyminiewska, G., Białowąs, S., Gołata, K., Olejnik, I., Shelest-Szumilas, O., Waligóra, A., Zboroń H. (2022). Nowe Pokolenie w Nowej Gospodarce. Raport. Poznań: Uniwersytet 18 Ekonomiczny.
Lane, B., & Kastenholz, E. (2015). Rural tourism: the evolution of practice and research approaches–towards a new generation concept?. Journal of Sustainable tourism, 23(8-9), 1133-1156.
Lase, D. (2019). Education and Industrial Revolution 4.0, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334837153_Education_and_Industrial_Revolution_40, 08.05.2022.
Lee, J., Davari, H., Singh, J., & Pandhare, V. (2018). Industrial Artificial Intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing letters, 18, 20-23.
Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S., & Bosma, N. (2013). Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study. Small business economics, 40, 693-714.
Leś, E. (2008). Gospodarka społeczna i przedsiębiorstwo społeczne. Wprowadzenie do problematyki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Luetkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the development agenda: The case for actively involving small and medium enterprises. Intereconomics, 39(3), 157-166.
Mahathir, M. (2004). Dasar ekonomi baru: intipati. Utusan Publications.
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition.
McCorkle, S., Meszaros, B. T., Odorzynski, S. J., Horwich, G., Schug, M. C., & Watts, M. W. (2001). Focus: Economic Systems. Council for Economic Educat.
McGrath, S. (2012). Vocational education and training for development: A policy in need of a theory?. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(5), 623-631.
Moore, M. (2000). Managing for Value: Organizational Strategy in For-profit, Non-profit, and Governmental Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, No. 29, pp. 189-195
Nosal, P., Waligóra, A. (2017). Retradycjonalizacja w ekonomii społecznej. Przykład spółdzielczości uczniowskiej. Ekonomia Społeczna, nr 1.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44.
Maisiri, W., Darwish, H., & Van Dyk, L. (2019). An investigation of industry 4.0 skills requirements. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 90-105.
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., ... & Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 26, 7-16.
Pereira, A. C., & Romero, F. (2017). A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia manufacturing, 13, 1206-1214.
Polanyi, M. (2016). On Popular Education in Economics. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, 42(3), 18-24.
Praszkier, R., Nowak, A. (2012). Przedsiębiorczość społeczna. Teoria i praktyka. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Pratt, A. C. (2000). New media, the new economy and new spaces. Geoforum, 31(4), 425-436.
Projekt Ustawy o ekonomii społecznej (2021) https://www.ekonomiaspoleczna.gov.pl/download/files/EKONOMIA_SPOLECZNA/PROJEKT_USTAWA_ES_12.05.2021.pdf, 32 08.05.2022.
Projekt Ustawy o przedsiębiorczości społecznej (2011). Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich, https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/sites/default/files/13220556010.pdf, 08.05.2022.
Prus, A.J. (2021). Funkcje witryn internetowych spółdzielni uczniowskich w szkołach ponadpodstawowych. Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana, 24(3).
Rahdari, A., Sepasi, S., & Moradi, M. (2016). Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 347-360.
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 43(1), 82-115.
Rogoff, B. (2008). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities, 58-74.
Rustiadi, E. (2018). Perencanaan dan pengembangan wilayah. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Saragih, R. (2017). Membangun usaha kreatif, inovatif dan bermanfaat melalui penerapan kewirausahaan sosial. Jurnal Kewirausahaan, 3(2), 26-34.
Sarma, M., & Pais, J. (2011). Financial inclusion and development. Journal of international development, 23(5), 613-628.
Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of business ethics, 111(3), 335-351.
Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business horizons, 48(3), 241-246.
Sijko, K. (ed.) (2013). Kompetencje komputerowe i informacyjne młodzieży w Polsce. Raport. Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych: Warszawa. https://scdn.pl/images/stories/ APORTY2014/18. pdf, 08.05.2022.
Spóÿdzielnie uczniowskie. Krajowa Rada Spóÿdzielcza, https://krs.org.pl/branzespoldzielcze/spoldzielczosc-uczniowska, 08.05.2022.
Stevenson, R. M., Kuratko, D. F., & Eutsler, J. (2019). Unleashing main street entrepreneurship: Crowdfunding, venture capital, and the democratization of new venture investments. Small Business Economics, 52, 375-393.
Stiroh, K. (1999). Is there a new economy?. Challenge, 42(4), 82-101.
Suroto, S. (2016). Dinamika kegiatan organisasi kemahasiswaan berbasis kearifan lokal dalam upaya memperkuat karakter unggul generasi muda. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 1040-1046.
Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational research review, 3(2), 130-154.
Waligóra, A. (2016). Uwarunkowania zróÿnicowania typów przedsiÿbiorczoÿci spoÿecznej (praca doktorska). Poznaÿ: Universitas Ekonomiczny di Poznaniu. http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/Content/404384/Waligora_Anna-rozprawa_doktorska.pdf, 08.05.2022.
Walsh, P. P., Murphy, E., & Horan, D. (2020). The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119957.
Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of world business, 41(1), 21-35.
Wiktorowicz, J., Wawras, I., Kuba, M., Staszewska, E., Woszczyk, P., Stankiewicz, A., Kliombka-Jarzyna, J. (2016). Pokolenia – apa yang terjadi? Kompendium zarzÿdzania multigenerasijnego. Warszawa: Wolter Kluwer.
Wilson, T. A. (2012). Supporting social enterprises to support vulnerable consumers: the example of community development finance institutions and financial exclusion. Journal of consumer policy, 35, 197-213.
Wright, S. C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of social Issues, 65(4), 859-879.
Wronka-Poÿpiech, M. Przedsiÿbiorstwo spoÿeczne – model konseptual bisnis. Przeglÿd Organizacji, 12.
Yitshaki, R., & Kropp, F. (2016). Motivations and opportunity recognition of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 546-565.
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 519-532.